Transgender youth and attraction to minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(add temp)
(back later)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:adj}}[[File:Transrights.jpg|thumb|278px|Transgender rights, including the medical treatment of transgender youth, is one of the most contentious cultural topics in 2020s mainstream media, invoking the topic of youth agency and potentially problematizing outdated concepts such as [[Moral panic|purity discourse]], [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]] and [[safeguarding]].]]
{{Template:adj}}[[File:Transrights.jpg|thumb|278px|Transgender rights, including the medical treatment of transgender youth, is one of the most contentious cultural topics in 2020s mainstream media, invoking the topic of youth agency and potentially problematizing outdated concepts such as [[Moral panic|purity discourse]], [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]] and [[safeguarding]].]]
The topic of '''[[Wikipedia:Transgender youth|trans youth]]''' (in particular, ''[[Wikipedia:Transgender health care|gender-affirming healthcare]]'', a theme of relevance to the [[Wikipedia:Anti-gender movement|culture war]] between conservatives/gender critical [[Feminism|feminists]] and modern social justice orthodoxy) has been frequently linked with [[Minor Attracted Person|attraction to minors]] and the [[MAP Movement]] in the 2020s. This linkage takes two forms, ''theoretical'' (as described below), and ''associative'' - where the trans-ness or trans-inclusivity of [[Minor Attracted Person|MAPs]] or vice versa is [[Grooming|weaponized by conservatives]] in political discourse. Some youth-liberationists, neutral and [[pro-c]] MAPs have advocated that the ongoing [[Wikipedia:Gender dysphoria in children|medicalization]] of transgender youth must be encouraged (or at least not resisted), as it will inevitably lead to the abandonment of [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]], and adoption of [[Research: Prevalence of Harm and Negative Outcomes|evidence-based approaches]] with respect to the sexual agency of minors in general. Thus, the topic of transgender youth is said to form an important part of the MAP Movement's [[War of adjacency|adjacency-enabled]] rise to public contention.
The topic of '''[[Wikipedia:Transgender youth|trans youth]]''' (in particular, ''[[Wikipedia:Transgender health care|gender-affirming healthcare]]'', a theme of relevance to the [[Wikipedia:Anti-gender movement|culture war]] between conservatives/gender critical [[Feminism|feminists]] and modern social justice orthodoxy) has been frequently linked with [[Minor Attracted Person|attraction to minors]] and the [[MAP Movement]] in the 2020s. This linkage takes two forms, ''theoretical'' (as described below), and ''associative'' - where the trans-ness or trans-inclusivity of [[Minor Attracted Person|MAPs]] or vice versa is [[Grooming|weaponized by conservatives]] in political discourse. Some youth-liberationists, neutral and [[pro-c]] MAPs have advocated that the ongoing [[Wikipedia:Gender dysphoria in children|medicalization]] of transgender youth must be encouraged (or at least not resisted), as it will inevitably lead to the abandonment of [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]], and adoption of [[Research: Prevalence of Harm and Negative Outcomes|evidence-based approaches]] with respect to the sexual agency of minors in general. Thus, the topic of transgender youth is said to form an important part of the MAP Movement's [[War of adjacency|adjacency-enabled]] rise to public contention.
==Linkages==
As mentioned, earlier, there have been some attempts to link the affirmation of transgender-identified youth with minor attraction - sometimes embraced and sometimes rejected by MAPs.
===''Theoretical''===
===''Associative''===


[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]

Revision as of 15:40, 25 October 2022

NewgonWiki's series on
MAP culture war
and war of adjacency
"Normalization" | "Groomer" | Trans Kids
Validity Policing | Lolicon Debate
MAP & LGBT Alliances | Proship
Pedophobia | Vigilantism | Moral panic
Activist model | Feminism | Queer
Ageism | Censorship | Hoax pedophilia
Anti | Pro-recovery | Alternative Initialism
Transage | Kinky Kids | Assimilationism
Template: Adj - This template
Transgender rights, including the medical treatment of transgender youth, is one of the most contentious cultural topics in 2020s mainstream media, invoking the topic of youth agency and potentially problematizing outdated concepts such as purity discourse, negative utilitarianism and safeguarding.

The topic of trans youth (in particular, gender-affirming healthcare, a theme of relevance to the culture war between conservatives/gender critical feminists and modern social justice orthodoxy) has been frequently linked with attraction to minors and the MAP Movement in the 2020s. This linkage takes two forms, theoretical (as described below), and associative - where the trans-ness or trans-inclusivity of MAPs or vice versa is weaponized by conservatives in political discourse. Some youth-liberationists, neutral and pro-c MAPs have advocated that the ongoing medicalization of transgender youth must be encouraged (or at least not resisted), as it will inevitably lead to the abandonment of negative utilitarianism, and adoption of evidence-based approaches with respect to the sexual agency of minors in general. Thus, the topic of transgender youth is said to form an important part of the MAP Movement's adjacency-enabled rise to public contention.

Linkages

As mentioned, earlier, there have been some attempts to link the affirmation of transgender-identified youth with minor attraction - sometimes embraced and sometimes rejected by MAPs.

Theoretical

Associative