Archive for the 'Llort' Category

Next Page »

Hetty Johnston: Cyber Child Saver

September 16th, 2008

Hot off the press from the woman to whom (lest we forget) any image of child nudity is a ticking time bomb of abusive indecency… He was a young man of just fifteen years. His partner in crime – a wizened harridan of 36 – wearer of the Cape of Accomplishment. Fuelled by a lust […]

The Adverse Effects of Child Sexual Hysteria (Part 1)

August 6th, 2008

Originally posted on ANU. If we were to put aside our case for non-contact pedophile rights – just for a moment, how many adverse consequences could we list for society in general? I almost considered grafting extra fingers to count them all. In this half of my post, I consider the negative impacts on Children: […]

Mind out for Mindspeak…

April 13th, 2008

…Daniel Lièvre’s rebuttal of AMC’s March 13 article for Absolute Zero (an anti-pedophile organisation). The article concerned appears to be an attempt to use cherry-picked and unsupported medical literature to (illegitimately) justify the current trend of intense hatred directed towards minor attracted persons – a group, it appears, taxonomically confused with child sex offenders and […]

The nature of human attraction

February 20th, 2008

The following is a revised argument for Debate Guide. I would appreciate feedback on how it compares to the previous version (sexual character of humanity), and any possible improvements to be made. We, as humans are highly capable of separating the act of mating from sexuality itself. With our long life cycles and complex relationships, […]

Debate Guide Update

February 9th, 2008

I have moved Debate Guide from its on-site location to its own domain, at For site administrators, the ftp details remain the same (simply insert [username]debateguide into the user field, instead of [username]newgon). Debate Guide remains an umbrella project of (the organisation, as opposed to the website), and I encourage all interested parties […]

Pseudo “discrediting”

December 1st, 2007

“This evidence is, on its own merits, enough to discredit anything Rind et al actually concluded”. (cut/paste The original paper can be found here. I cited this blogging post because it encapsulates quite well, one of the basic methods of upholding sacred consensus dogmas; the false claim of active discrediting, where in fact the […]

If it comes down on Free Spirits…

November 2nd, 2007

…it goes up at Just sticking to my word. Here is the personal address of “anti pedophile” crusader and goon figurehead Phillip Eide a.k.a. Xavier von Erck, requested and hosted by Catherine NX, a project associate. It must be made clear that any personal information may be out of date, and most obviously that the intention is not […]

Failure to discriminate…

October 23rd, 2007

“The victimologist’s pedophile barrel needs to be upended on the laboratory bench and its contents carefully identified and sorted by impartial examiners. Those items lacking scientific credibility need to be discarded, and new containers found for some others. A few, such as the first of the above described scenarios, can be correctly placed back in […]


October 9th, 2007

Don’t get me wrong. I do not oppose provocative imagery or ideas. But occasionally, something just comes along and reaffirms my belief that various members of a certain political movement do not value the interests of young people or even their own stated ideals as highly as they claim. In fact, all that today’s self-styled pedo-hunter, confirmed Nazi […]

“Child” and “Sex”: Two false and conflicting constructs

September 4th, 2007

Child   Do “children” really have any grounding in nature? By a grounding in nature, I mean a correlate in human genetics. Well, of course they do. “Children” are less developed (or indeed better adapted to their life phase) and that’s why we call them children. But why do we use “child” as a category for ages zero […]

Next Page »