Template:Debate Guide:Other arguments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Other arguments don't relate ''fundamentally'' to attractions, minors or relationships...''' | '''Other arguments don't relate ''fundamentally'' to attractions, minors or relationships, and instead focus on the debate itself, and its key participants...''' | ||
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Your arguments must be self-serving|Your arguments must be self-serving]] - Emotional, accusative and fallacious argument. | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Your arguments must be self-serving|Your arguments must be self-serving]] - Emotional, accusative and fallacious argument. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Newgon's History|Newgon's History]] - Various misrepresentations of this website and its users. | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Newgon's History|Newgon's History]] - Various misrepresentations of this website and its users. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Child abuse industry|Child abuse industry]] - Child sexual abuse has an "industrial complex" all of its own. | *[[Debate Guide: Child abuse industry|Child abuse industry]] - Child sexual abuse has an "industrial complex" all of its own. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: The professional victim|The professional victim]] - The sexual abuse discourse perpetuates itself via well-meaning victims. | :*[[Debate Guide: The professional victim|The professional victim]] - The sexual abuse discourse perpetuates itself via well-meaning victims. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: | *[[Debate Guide: State hypocrisy|State hypocrisy]] - Why concerns about child abuse may be disingenuous. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Abuse of language|Abuse of language]] - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes. | *[[Debate Guide: Abuse of language|Abuse of language]] - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Blame game|Blame game]] - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats. | *[[Debate Guide: Blame game|Blame game]] - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:50, 11 April 2024
Other arguments don't relate fundamentally to attractions, minors or relationships, and instead focus on the debate itself, and its key participants...
- Against: Your arguments must be self-serving - Emotional, accusative and fallacious argument.
- Against: "As a parent" or "as a survivor" - Some wrongly argue that only parents are qualified to make judgments.
- Against: Religious arguments - Misquoting bible verses is an occasional anti-MAP strategy.
- Against: Newgon's History - Various misrepresentations of this website and its users.
- Child abuse industry - Child sexual abuse has an "industrial complex" all of its own.
- The professional victim - The sexual abuse discourse perpetuates itself via well-meaning victims.
- State hypocrisy - Why concerns about child abuse may be disingenuous.
- Abuse of language - Language is misused and redefined to suit nefarious purposes.
- Blame game - How societies and individuals look for easy scapegoats.
Debate Guide is a work in progress, and some material is undeveloped...
- Short arguments - A large number of smaller arguments for use in debates.
From the encyclopedia...
- Hysterical reactions have many adverse effects
- Self-fulfilling prophecy - Examples from within and outside of the MAP community.
- SOR problems - Registries for sexual offenders are unfair and counteractive.
- Child pornography is much misunderstood, and is most certainly not a multibillion dollar industry (research).