If you are having problems logging in after our change of primary domain, please clear cookies/site data from newgon.net and yesmap.net. This can be done in your browser settings.
Template:EGLConsent: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | File:Levinereview1.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]] | ||
File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | File:Levinereview2.png|Liz Highleyman's review of [[Judith Levine]]'s [[Harmful to Minors]]: Consent dogma | ||
File:Fouca.png|Foucault, 1978 | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:46, 24 April 2023
-
Bruce Rind on CSA concept (in)validity
-
Rind on lack of predictive validity for informed consent/CSA concept invalidity
-
Rind - CSA concept invalidity continued
-
David Finkelhor (Abuse Guru) and his failed moral circular argument
-
Robert Ehman on the failed circular "consent" argument
-
Robert Ehman on the real reasons for consent vs no consent binarism
-
Terry Leahy: Absence of an ethical argument against age-gap sex
-
Paul Okami on Power Imbalance argument (from Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002))
-
Review of Sandfort and consent
-
Scott De Orio on Queer Identities that don't fit the model of consent
-
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors
-
Liz Highleyman's review of Judith Levine's Harmful to Minors: Consent dogma
-
Foucault, 1978
