Transgender youth and attraction to minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(starting)
 
(more)
Line 1: Line 1:
The topic of '''[[Wikipedia:Transgender youth|trans youth]]''' (in particular, ''[[Wikipedia:Transgender health care|gender-affirming healthcare]]'', a topic of relevance to the [[Wikipedia:Anti-gender movement|culture war]] between conservatives/gender critical [[Feminism|feminists]] and modern social justice orthodoxy) has been frequently linked with [[Minor Attracted Person|attraction to minors]] and the [[MAP Movement]] in the 2020s. This linkage takes two forms, ''theoretical'' (as described below), and ''associative'' - where the trans-ness or trans-inclusivity of [[Minor Attracted Person|MAPs]] or vice versa is [[Grooming|weaponized by conservatives]] in political discourse. Some youth-liberationists, neutral and [[pro-c]] MAPs have advocated that the ongoing [[Wikipedia:Gender dysphoria in children|medicalization]] of transgender youth must be encouraged (or at least not resisted), as it will inevitably lead to the abandonment of [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]] with respect to the sexual agency of minors in general.
[[File:Transrights.jpg|thumb|Transgender rights, including the medical treatment of transgender youth, is one of the most contentious cultural topics in 2020s mainstream media, invoking the topic of youth agency and potentially problematizing [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]].]]
The topic of '''[[Wikipedia:Transgender youth|trans youth]]''' (in particular, ''[[Wikipedia:Transgender health care|gender-affirming healthcare]]'', a topic of relevance to the [[Wikipedia:Anti-gender movement|culture war]] between conservatives/gender critical [[Feminism|feminists]] and modern social justice orthodoxy) has been frequently linked with [[Minor Attracted Person|attraction to minors]] and the [[MAP Movement]] in the 2020s. This linkage takes two forms, ''theoretical'' (as described below), and ''associative'' - where the trans-ness or trans-inclusivity of [[Minor Attracted Person|MAPs]] or vice versa is [[Grooming|weaponized by conservatives]] in political discourse. Some youth-liberationists, neutral and [[pro-c]] MAPs have advocated that the ongoing [[Wikipedia:Gender dysphoria in children|medicalization]] of transgender youth must be encouraged (or at least not resisted), as it will inevitably lead to the abandonment of [[Debate Guide: If we could only save one child|negative utilitarianism]], and adoption of [[Research: Prevalence of Harm and Negative Outcomes|evidence-based approaches]] with respect to the sexual agency of minors in general.


[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]
[[Category:Official Encyclopedia]]

Revision as of 15:22, 25 October 2022

Transgender rights, including the medical treatment of transgender youth, is one of the most contentious cultural topics in 2020s mainstream media, invoking the topic of youth agency and potentially problematizing negative utilitarianism.

The topic of trans youth (in particular, gender-affirming healthcare, a topic of relevance to the culture war between conservatives/gender critical feminists and modern social justice orthodoxy) has been frequently linked with attraction to minors and the MAP Movement in the 2020s. This linkage takes two forms, theoretical (as described below), and associative - where the trans-ness or trans-inclusivity of MAPs or vice versa is weaponized by conservatives in political discourse. Some youth-liberationists, neutral and pro-c MAPs have advocated that the ongoing medicalization of transgender youth must be encouraged (or at least not resisted), as it will inevitably lead to the abandonment of negative utilitarianism, and adoption of evidence-based approaches with respect to the sexual agency of minors in general.