Talk:BLogo: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎LBLogo: Typo fix)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== LBLogo ==
== LBLogo ==
I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want to point out that I believe any mention of the LBLogo should be done within the BLogo page rather than having its own page since it really is little more than a distortion of the BLogo, and its meaning is practically the same. Certainly it is not significant enough on its own to call for a whole new page, is it? --[[User:Pantheadoros|Pantheadoros]] 20:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want to point out that I believe any mention of the LBLogo should be done within the BLogo page rather than having its own page since it really is little more than a distortion of the BLogo, and its meaning is practically the same. Certainly it is not significant enough on its own to call for a whole new page, is it? --[[User:Pantheadoros|Pantheadoros]] 20:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
:Perhaps have it as a <nowiki>==Subsection==</nowiki> [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 20:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:50, 21 May 2009

I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want to point out that I believe any mention of the LBLogo should be done within the BLogo page rather than having its own page since it really is little more than a distortion of the BLogo, and its meaning is practically the same. Certainly it is not significant enough on its own to call for a whole new page, is it? --Pantheadoros 20:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps have it as a ==Subsection== The Admins 20:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)