Talk:Anti-contact: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Regarding: *'''Consequentialist anti-c (c-anti-c).''' In this instance, celibacy is called for in the present climate. Further, such an individual might maintain that: **They...") |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**They oppose age of consent reform." | **They oppose age of consent reform." | ||
Would consequentialist anti-contact MAPs really argue the latter two positions? If the argument is that adult-child sexual activity is harmful due to society's reactions to it, surely reforming age of consent laws and battling the stigma would be a positive? | Would consequentialist anti-contact MAPs really argue the latter two positions? If the argument is that adult-child sexual activity is harmful due to society's reactions to it, surely reforming age of consent laws and battling the stigma would be a positive? --[[User:The Admins|The Admins]] ([[User talk:The Admins|talk]]) 19:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 2 December 2021
Regarding:
- Consequentialist anti-c (c-anti-c). In this instance, celibacy is called for in the present climate. Further, such an individual might maintain that:
- They are not presently interested in age of consent reform. Supporters of very limited reforms sometimes also self-describe as anti-contact.
- They oppose age of consent reform."
Would consequentialist anti-contact MAPs really argue the latter two positions? If the argument is that adult-child sexual activity is harmful due to society's reactions to it, surely reforming age of consent laws and battling the stigma would be a positive? --The Admins (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)