Debate Guide: Porn is the theory, rape is its practise: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: :''"Child porn increases the incidence of child sex abuse".'' The evidence suggests otherwise. In fact, the presence of any kind of relationship is unclear, due to limitations in the amou...)
 
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''"Child porn increases the incidence of child sex abuse".''
[[File:Wap1979.jpg|thumb|Women Against Pornography in 1979]]
<blockquote><font color="green">'''''[[Child pornography]] <u>increases the incidence</u> of child sex abuse via a <u>normalizing effect.</u>'''''</font></blockquote>
The [[Research: Child Pornography|evidence]] suggests otherwise, as does the [[Research: The effects of pornography|evidence for adult porn]].


The evidence suggests otherwise. In fact, the presence of any kind of relationship is unclear, due to limitations in the amount of and scope of research. One may theorise however, that porn in general is a 'substitute for action', and that if it does normalise any kind of behaviour, it would be in line with the behaviour expressed in the pornography. Thus, most normalising effects, if they do exist, would tend to be towards uncoerced sex - [http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm overwhelmingly common] in child porn that depicts physical interaction.
However, lets theorize that porn is a 'substitute for action', and that if it does normalize any kind of behavior, it would be in line with the behavior expressed in the child pornography. Thus, most normalizing effects, if they do exist, would tend to be towards non-coerced sex, overwhelmingly common,<ref>[http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm Schuijer and Rossen, 1992] - For Tor, or if this doesn't work, use [https://web.archive.org/web/20210425060319/http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm Web archive]</ref> even in pre-webcam/smartphone CP depicting physical interactions. Of course, more recent research shows the vast majority of such "porn" is solo acts of masturbation filmed by teen girls in their own bedrooms.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 8: Line 10:


*[[Research: Child Pornography]]
*[[Research: Child Pornography]]
==References==


[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Sociological]][[Category:Debating Points: Minor-Attracted]][[Category:Debating Points: Adults]][[Category:Debating Points: Adult-Minor sex]]
[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Sociological]][[Category:Debating Points: Minor-Attracted]][[Category:Debating Points: Adults]][[Category:Debating Points: Adult-Minor sex]]

Latest revision as of 15:46, 14 April 2024

Women Against Pornography in 1979

Child pornography increases the incidence of child sex abuse via a normalizing effect.

The evidence suggests otherwise, as does the evidence for adult porn.

However, lets theorize that porn is a 'substitute for action', and that if it does normalize any kind of behavior, it would be in line with the behavior expressed in the child pornography. Thus, most normalizing effects, if they do exist, would tend to be towards non-coerced sex, overwhelmingly common,[1] even in pre-webcam/smartphone CP depicting physical interactions. Of course, more recent research shows the vast majority of such "porn" is solo acts of masturbation filmed by teen girls in their own bedrooms.

See also

Despite the burden of proof being on those who claim that a relation does exist, research will help in justifying claims to the contrary.

References

  1. Schuijer and Rossen, 1992 - For Tor, or if this doesn't work, use Web archive