Template:EGLPHP: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:28, 12 January 2022

A comparison of various phallometric studies
Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles

Summary vs Criminal rates: Conclusion = many nonoffending pedophiles
Phallometric studies establish hebephilic interest as normative, pedophilic as common
(Continued) Prevalence of pedophile feelings 20% of men, even in self-reports
Tromovitch Presentation (using inclusivist/nonpreferential definition of pedophilia)
Tromovitch Presentation (cont'd)
Barbaree and Marshall - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response

Barbaree and Marshall - showing prevalence of heterosexual pedophilic and hebephilic response
Hebephilia is universal (see characteristics and the associated article for more excerpts)
Search results suggest hebephilia is common
...as do historical marriage trends
Example RV curve
Preference for neotenic features is common
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 File:Searches.jpg|Search results suggest hebephilia is common
 File:FirstMarriageBinfordDataset2001.jpg|...as do historical marriage trends
+File:FHyyjPYX0AQBzwG.png|Example RV curve
+File:FHyylMWX0Agjj-e.jpg|Preference for neotenic features is common
 File:Nonoffendingpedo.png|Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
 </gallery>