Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
File:Chenier-TheNaturalOrderOfDisorder(sociocultural).jpg|Sociocultural perspective on pedophilia as a disorder - Chenier | File:Chenier-TheNaturalOrderOfDisorder(sociocultural).jpg|Sociocultural perspective on pedophilia as a disorder - Chenier | ||
File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | ||
File:Psycho.jpeg|The myth of psychopathy | |||
File:Retards.png|Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth | File:Retards.png|Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth | ||
File:Nonsex.jpg|Nonsexual aspects | File:Nonsex.jpg|Nonsexual aspects | ||
Revision as of 07:17, 18 February 2022
-
A warning about the political nature of Psychiatry
-
Moser and Kleinpatz - Paraphilia is a questionable concept
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation
-
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA
-
DSM-5 another graphic
-
Some chronophilias
-
Mirkin on methodological flaws and gay analogy
-
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence?
-
Sociocultural perspective on pedophilia as a disorder - Chenier
-
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths
-
The myth of psychopathy
-
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth
-
Nonsexual aspects
-
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
-
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles
-
Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs
-
Hebephilia is normative
-
Rind and Yuill on adaptive hebephilia
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
.jpg)
