Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
File:Female.png|Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs | File:Female.png|Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs | ||
File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is normative | File:Hebe.jpg|Hebephilia is normative | ||
File: | File:Rindyuillhebe1.png|Rind and Yuill on adaptive hebephilia | ||
File:Rindyuillhebe2.png|Rind and Yuill (cont'd) | |||
File:Hebevstel.png|Rind and Yuill (cont'd) | |||
Rindyuillhebe4.png|Rind and Yuill (cont'd) | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 31 December 2021
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation
-
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA
-
DSM-5 another graphic
-
Some chronophilias
-
Mirkin on methodological flaws and gay analogy
-
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence?
-
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths
-
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth
-
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
-
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles
-
Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs
-
Hebephilia is normative
-
Rind and Yuill on adaptive hebephilia
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
-
Rind and Yuill (cont'd)
