Template:EGLPHC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
File:Pedodisorder.png|DSM-5 another graphic | File:Pedodisorder.png|DSM-5 another graphic | ||
File:MDEdge.png|Some chronophilias | File:MDEdge.png|Some chronophilias | ||
File:MirkinHomosexualMethodology.jpg|Mirkin on methodological flaws and | File:MirkinHomosexualMethodology.jpg|Mirkin on methodological flaws and gay analogy | ||
File:PedoAsOrientation.png|Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? | File:PedoAsOrientation.png|Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence? | ||
File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | File:Devped.png|Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 31 December 2021
-
Americal Psychiatric Assiciation's DSM-5 Manual says pedophilia can be an orientation
-
Charles Moser on the subsequent coverage and bumbling by the APA
-
DSM-5 another graphic
-
Some chronophilias
-
Mirkin on methodological flaws and gay analogy
-
Gaither: How does the idea of pedophilia as an orientation stand against the evidence?
-
Development of pedophilia, choice and abused-abuser myths
-
Retarded or perturbed pedophile myth
-
Non-offending pedophilia and impulse control
-
The efficacy and consequences of attempts to treat Pedophiles
-
Lievesley/Lapworth 2021 - State of play with female MAPs
-
Hebephilia is normative
-
Rind and Yuill on adaptive hebephilia
