Talk:Research: Cognitive ability: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Moral reasoning: "Turiel (1983) has shown that young children do not believe [that actions are wrong just because they are punished]. They say that harmful acts, such as hitting and pullin...) |
m (Talk:Research: Cognitive Ability Research moved to Talk:Research: Cognitive ability: redundant) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Moral reasoning: "Turiel (1983) has shown that young children do not believe [that actions are wrong just because they are punished]. They say that harmful acts, such as hitting and pulling hair, are wrong whether they are punished or not. They even say that such acts would be wrong if adults ordered them to be done."[http://virginia.academia.edu/JonathanHaidt/Papers/29054/The-Emotional-Dog-and-its-Rational-Tail] | Moral reasoning: "Turiel (1983) has shown that young children do not believe [that actions are wrong just because they are punished]. They say that harmful acts, such as hitting and pulling hair, are wrong whether they are punished or not. They even say that such acts would be wrong if adults ordered them to be done."[http://virginia.academia.edu/JonathanHaidt/Papers/29054/The-Emotional-Dog-and-its-Rational-Tail] | ||
:I like the direction the quote takes, but how was the study controlled? [[User:The Admins|The Admins]] 23:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:09, 6 April 2009
Moral reasoning: "Turiel (1983) has shown that young children do not believe [that actions are wrong just because they are punished]. They say that harmful acts, such as hitting and pulling hair, are wrong whether they are punished or not. They even say that such acts would be wrong if adults ordered them to be done."[1]
- I like the direction the quote takes, but how was the study controlled? The Admins 23:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)