Talk:BLogo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pantheadoros (talk | contribs) (New page: == LBLogo == I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want t...) |
Pantheadoros (talk | contribs) m (→LBLogo: Typo fix) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== LBLogo == | == LBLogo == | ||
I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want to point out that I believe any mention of the LBLogo should be done within the BLogo page rather than having its own | I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want to point out that I believe any mention of the LBLogo should be done within the BLogo page rather than having its own page since it really is little more than a distortion of the BLogo, and its meaning is practically the same. Certainly it is not significant enough on its own to call for a whole new page, is it? --[[User:Pantheadoros|Pantheadoros]] 20:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:27, 21 May 2009
LBLogo
I noticed that LBLogo was never written, and so I just replaced the link to it under 'See also' by moving the link to GLogo to the top. I am writing this here because I want to point out that I believe any mention of the LBLogo should be done within the BLogo page rather than having its own page since it really is little more than a distortion of the BLogo, and its meaning is practically the same. Certainly it is not significant enough on its own to call for a whole new page, is it? --Pantheadoros 20:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)