Debate Guide: It's wrong because it's illegal: Difference between revisions
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''" | :''"Adult-minor sex is wrong, period. Because it's illegal/outlawed in most societies."'' | ||
<hr> | |||
Nothing is wrong just because it's illegal. Law is a flexible system of moral judgements, which vary according to the place on earth and the time in history. Laws, being written before the act and involving nothing more than subjective judgements, have no ethical authority over the rightness of any practice. One example that demonstrates this is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscegenation miscegnation], but lets instead cover gay sex: | |||
According to your very basic legalistic morality, gay sex has gone from being 'wrong' to 'more/totally acceptable' in a number of recent societies, as the laws changed and were eventually equalized. Gay sex would also be wrong in some present societies that outlaw it, but not elsewhere! If the circular reasoning of "illegal = wrong = illegal" was a vaild argument, all forms of deregulation would automatically be immoral/irresponsible, and there would be no acceptable reason for the legalisation of any human behavior. We would be living in a dictatorship after a few generations. | |||
==Fallacies and cognitive distortions covered== | ==Fallacies and cognitive distortions covered== | ||
Revision as of 13:01, 26 October 2021
- "Adult-minor sex is wrong, period. Because it's illegal/outlawed in most societies."
Nothing is wrong just because it's illegal. Law is a flexible system of moral judgements, which vary according to the place on earth and the time in history. Laws, being written before the act and involving nothing more than subjective judgements, have no ethical authority over the rightness of any practice. One example that demonstrates this is miscegnation, but lets instead cover gay sex:
According to your very basic legalistic morality, gay sex has gone from being 'wrong' to 'more/totally acceptable' in a number of recent societies, as the laws changed and were eventually equalized. Gay sex would also be wrong in some present societies that outlaw it, but not elsewhere! If the circular reasoning of "illegal = wrong = illegal" was a vaild argument, all forms of deregulation would automatically be immoral/irresponsible, and there would be no acceptable reason for the legalisation of any human behavior. We would be living in a dictatorship after a few generations.
Fallacies and cognitive distortions covered
- Circulus in probando fallacy: The reasoning behind this argument is a fallacious circular ("We know it is wrong because it was made illegal because it's wrong").
- Cognitive distortion: Musturbation.