Debate Guide: Historical nonadult-adult sex: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''For research, see [[Nonwestern Intergenerational Relationships]], [[Intergenerational Relationships in History]].''
:''For research, see [[Research: Nonwestern Intergenerational Relationships|Nonwestern Intergenerational Relationships]], [[Research: Intergenerational Relationships in History|Intergenerational Relationships in History]].''


This imposition of social rules has become particularly
Imposition of [[Wikipedia:Antisexualism|antisexual]] values upon youth has only been the norm for the last couple of centuries in Western culture. In other cultures - so-called ‘primitive societies’ (e.g. the tribes of Papa New Guinea, Melanesia, and Aboriginal Australia), and also in ‘advanced’ societies (e.g. Ancient Greece and feudal [[Pederasty in Japanese culture|Japan]]) - and even in the West up until the 17th century - physically intimate behavior was never so rigidly labelled. What today would be termed ’sexual activity’ frequently fulfilled other purposes and functions. Phallic worship existed in almost every pre-Christian society, and served as a symbolic ritual of the vitality, strength, and essence of humankind. This frequently translated into [[Sexual rites of passage|initiation rites]], whereby boys were ‘inseminated’ - in some cases from the age of 8, either anally or orally, with the sperm of older boys and men.
intransigent only in the last couple of centuries in Western
culture. In other cultures - so-called ‘primitive societies’ (e.g.
the tribes of Papa New Guinea, Melanesia, and Aboriginal
Australia), and also in ‘advanced’ societies (e.g. Ancient Greece
and feudal Japan) - and even in the West up until the 17th century -
physically intimate behaviour was never so rigidly labelled. What
today would be termed ’sexual activity’ frequently fulfilled other
purposes and functions. Phallic worship existed in almost every pre-
Christian society, and served as a symbolic ritual of the vitality,
strength, and essence of humankind. This frequently translated into
initiation rites, whereby boys were ‘inseminated’ - in some cases
from the age of 8, either anally or orally, with the sperm of older
boys and men.


Such acts were not regarded as ’sexual’ as contemporary society
Such acts were not regarded as ’sexual’ as contemporary society would deem it - and were not regarded as primarily erotic or sensual acts - but were an essential aspect of transferring wisdom and honor to the young boys. To such an extent ’sex’ was an important aspect of socialization; a way of linking one generation to the next - a linkage that present day society sorely lacks. Such socialization was not merely confined to the human species, but also is widespread throughout our relatives in the animal kingdom, whereby pseudo-mating acts between older males and younger males serve as a crucial aspect in promoting cohesion amongst the group.
would deem it - and were not regarded as primarily erotic or
 
sensual acts - but were an essential aspect of transferring wisdom
==Excerpt Graphic Library==
and honour to the young boys. To such an extent ’sex’ was an
 
important aspect of socialization; a way of linking one generation
The EGL on '''Broader Perspectives''' has some relevant information. Just right click/save and reproduce by uploading in short-form media to bypass character limits.
to the next - a linkage that present day society sorely lacks. Such
 
socialization was not merely confined to the human species, but
{{Template:EGLBP}}
also is widespread throughout our relatives in the animal kingdom,
 
whereby pseudo-mating acts between older males and younger males
==References==
serve as a crucial aspect in promoting cohesion amongst the group.


[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Sociological]][[Category:Debating Points: Adults]][[Category:Debating Points: Child/Minor]]
[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Sociological]][[Category:Debating Points: Adults]][[Category:Debating Points: Child/Minor]]

Latest revision as of 00:37, 12 April 2024

For research, see Nonwestern Intergenerational Relationships, Intergenerational Relationships in History.

Imposition of antisexual values upon youth has only been the norm for the last couple of centuries in Western culture. In other cultures - so-called ‘primitive societies’ (e.g. the tribes of Papa New Guinea, Melanesia, and Aboriginal Australia), and also in ‘advanced’ societies (e.g. Ancient Greece and feudal Japan) - and even in the West up until the 17th century - physically intimate behavior was never so rigidly labelled. What today would be termed ’sexual activity’ frequently fulfilled other purposes and functions. Phallic worship existed in almost every pre-Christian society, and served as a symbolic ritual of the vitality, strength, and essence of humankind. This frequently translated into initiation rites, whereby boys were ‘inseminated’ - in some cases from the age of 8, either anally or orally, with the sperm of older boys and men.

Such acts were not regarded as ’sexual’ as contemporary society would deem it - and were not regarded as primarily erotic or sensual acts - but were an essential aspect of transferring wisdom and honor to the young boys. To such an extent ’sex’ was an important aspect of socialization; a way of linking one generation to the next - a linkage that present day society sorely lacks. Such socialization was not merely confined to the human species, but also is widespread throughout our relatives in the animal kingdom, whereby pseudo-mating acts between older males and younger males serve as a crucial aspect in promoting cohesion amongst the group.

Excerpt Graphic Library

The EGL on Broader Perspectives has some relevant information. Just right click/save and reproduce by uploading in short-form media to bypass character limits.

References