Debate Guide: All child molesters are pedophiles: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Struggling to find that refrence. Range average estimated at 20% in cso population.)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''"Sexual abusers of children are primarily attracted to their targets"''
:''"Sexual abusers of children, abuse because of a sexual preference for their targets"''


Or...
Or...
Line 5: Line 5:
:''"Child sex abuse and pedophilia are partners in crime. The latter is the cause of almost all cases of the former"''
:''"Child sex abuse and pedophilia are partners in crime. The latter is the cause of almost all cases of the former"''


It is estimated that only '''2 to 10 percent of child sexual abuse perpetrators meet the regular criteria for pedophilia''' (Kinsey-Report, Lautmann, Brongersma, Groth). Others reinforce this, as indicated by our article, [[Research: Pedophiles in the criminal population]], the vast majority of offenders being non - pedophiles who have been driven to offend by their personal situations. Such "situational" offending is particularly common in crimes of incest involving children. Possible causes include the removal, senescence or disablement of adult partners and the unavailability of alternative adults.
While estimates vary, it is estimated by researchers that around '''20% meet the regular criteria for pedophilia'''. [[Research: Pedophiles in the criminal population]] gives an excellent summary of the findings. Many of these men among the higher estimates of 25-50% are also likely to be misdiagnosed [[hebephilia|hebephiles]]. The vast majority of offenders are non-pedophiles who have been driven to offend by their personal situations. Such "situational" offending is particularly common in crimes of incest involving younger children. Possible causes include general proximity or convenience, the removal/ageing/disablement of adult partners and general lack of confidence approaching socially appropriate adults.


One could even speculatively argue that child sex offending is lower among pedophiles (compare the 2-10% projection to the apparent pedophile frequency in the [[Kent State Study]]), although it is worth noting that most observers attribute a higher number of infringements per captia to pedophilic offenders, as opposed to situational offenders. This may be because attractions last a lifetime whilst situations come and go.
One could even argue that child sex offending is lower among pedophiles. While it does involve some chicanery, it stands as a good example of what you can do with statistics:
 
*Project '''pedophilia in the general population at 10%''' from the 30% equal or greater arousal to prepubescent children in the [[Kent State Study]] and various others.
*Project '''pedophilia among child sex offenders at 5%''' from Lautmann's study in our [[Research: Pedophiles in the criminal population|reading list]].
 
Thus, one could argue that '''men in the general population have a 2x higher risk of offending against a child''', when compared to true pedophiles.
 
Of course, research would seem to indicate the real numbers are likely to be closer to 5% pedophiles in the general population and 20% pedophiles in the child sex offender population. This would infer a 4x higher risk of offending among true pedophiles, although it should be cautioned that this is from a very low baseline, and would confirm the existence of large numbers of non-offending pedophiles in the population.


[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Minor-Attracted]][[Category:Debating Points: Adult-Minor sex]]
[[Category:Debate]][[Category:Debating Points: Minor-Attracted]][[Category:Debating Points: Adult-Minor sex]]

Revision as of 17:13, 21 September 2021

"Sexual abusers of children, abuse because of a sexual preference for their targets"

Or...

"Child sex abuse and pedophilia are partners in crime. The latter is the cause of almost all cases of the former"

While estimates vary, it is estimated by researchers that around 20% meet the regular criteria for pedophilia. Research: Pedophiles in the criminal population gives an excellent summary of the findings. Many of these men among the higher estimates of 25-50% are also likely to be misdiagnosed hebephiles. The vast majority of offenders are non-pedophiles who have been driven to offend by their personal situations. Such "situational" offending is particularly common in crimes of incest involving younger children. Possible causes include general proximity or convenience, the removal/ageing/disablement of adult partners and general lack of confidence approaching socially appropriate adults.

One could even argue that child sex offending is lower among pedophiles. While it does involve some chicanery, it stands as a good example of what you can do with statistics:

  • Project pedophilia in the general population at 10% from the 30% equal or greater arousal to prepubescent children in the Kent State Study and various others.
  • Project pedophilia among child sex offenders at 5% from Lautmann's study in our reading list.

Thus, one could argue that men in the general population have a 2x higher risk of offending against a child, when compared to true pedophiles.

Of course, research would seem to indicate the real numbers are likely to be closer to 5% pedophiles in the general population and 20% pedophiles in the child sex offender population. This would infer a 4x higher risk of offending among true pedophiles, although it should be cautioned that this is from a very low baseline, and would confirm the existence of large numbers of non-offending pedophiles in the population.