Template:EGLHarm: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:03, 7 January 2022

Basic Rind Paradox infographic
Summarized Rind findings
Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm
Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in The Guardian
What victimologists say about youth perception + admissions of iatrogenic harm
Self-perception: Importance
Some reading on secondary harm and perception/situational variables
More secondary harms
Intrinsic vs secondary harm
Daly's 2021 repetition of Rind (1998), finds that self-perception is far more important that abuse status
Lahtinen Report: Most common reason for not reporting - event not serious enough
College outcomes: Benefits of college samples
LGBT outcome/perception data (links to papers in this release)
Simpler way of expressing Lesbian outcomes (ref to modern feminism)
Further distillation of Rind's Kinsey analysis
General reading on intrinsic harm
The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm
The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm
CSA harm was known to be confounded even before Rind
No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"
Rind on methodological issues/limitations of victimology
The Lanning (1992) report - full of hysterical conjecture, nevertheless describes the "most common" forms of offender and victim in banal terms that are applicable to most relationships (in order to prepare investigators to pathologize banality).

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 File:Syndrome.jpg|No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"
 File:Rindonesizevictimology.png|Rind on methodological issues/limitations of victimology
+File:Lanning2.png|<small>The Lanning (1992) report - full of hysterical conjecture, nevertheless describes the "most common" forms of offender and victim in banal terms that are applicable to most relationships (in order to prepare investigators to pathologize banality).</small>
 </gallery>