User talk:Prue: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=NewgonWiki:Article_template_for_a_stub&action=edit copy the wikitext and paste into the articles, then knock out the categories and sections you don't need and work the content]. --[[User:JohnHolt|JohnHolt]] ([[User talk:JohnHolt|talk]]) 09:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
[https://www.newgon.net/wiki/index.php?title=NewgonWiki:Article_template_for_a_stub&action=edit copy the wikitext and paste into the articles, then knock out the categories and sections you don't need and work the content]. --[[User:JohnHolt|JohnHolt]] ([[User talk:JohnHolt|talk]]) 09:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
==Thank You==
Hi there. As you can see I'm still slowly slowly learning by doing, making contributions here and there to try and get a handle on how editing and creating pages works. Apologies for my sloppiness... And thank you for making separate pages for Borneman and Sonenschein; I put way too much info but I'm not too sure on how to create a page as opposed to just editing an already made one. I'll practice making a page in the near future, as I'm thinking of creating a page "bias in research" where I'll summarize the few explicit analysis of research bias by Bruce Rind and Alayne Yates, respectively. And prob discuss Paul Okami and Joel Best's discussions of victimological [non-scientific] terminology being used in research. Also, if you've not seen these pages yet I wonder if they'd be good to archive https://famouspedophiles.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/notables-figures-living-or-dead-who-evinced-an-attraction-to-people-under-16-with-a-focus-on-under-13/  and https://famouspedophiles.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/famous-pedophiles/

Revision as of 23:23, 10 November 2021

Hi

Thanks for submitting the sources to the new article on the lGBT movement. Here is a template for citations:

<ref>[https://example.com/example Citation or rough name]</ref>

For no Link:

<ref>Citation</ref>

--JohnHolt (talk) 08:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

I have created two articles

With topical information you submitted to Censorship:

In time, these will be developed, but this might be a good point to look at the foundational basis of a working article. We templated one a while back:

copy the wikitext and paste into the articles, then knock out the categories and sections you don't need and work the content. --JohnHolt (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank You

Hi there. As you can see I'm still slowly slowly learning by doing, making contributions here and there to try and get a handle on how editing and creating pages works. Apologies for my sloppiness... And thank you for making separate pages for Borneman and Sonenschein; I put way too much info but I'm not too sure on how to create a page as opposed to just editing an already made one. I'll practice making a page in the near future, as I'm thinking of creating a page "bias in research" where I'll summarize the few explicit analysis of research bias by Bruce Rind and Alayne Yates, respectively. And prob discuss Paul Okami and Joel Best's discussions of victimological [non-scientific] terminology being used in research. Also, if you've not seen these pages yet I wonder if they'd be good to archive https://famouspedophiles.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/notables-figures-living-or-dead-who-evinced-an-attraction-to-people-under-16-with-a-focus-on-under-13/ and https://famouspedophiles.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/famous-pedophiles/