Template:EGLHarm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny1(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm | File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny1(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm | ||
File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny2(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm | File:RBT Scientifically Incorrect Iatrogeny2(2000).jpg|The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm | ||
File:Family confounds.png|CSA harm was known to be counfounded even before Rind | |||
File:Syndrome.jpg|No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome" | File:Syndrome.jpg|No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome" | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 11 November 2021
-
Rind and Tromovitch (2000) on Iatrogenic Harm
-
Research pointing to no intrinsic harm profiled in The Guardian
-
What victimologists say about youth perception + admissions of iatrogenic harm
-
Some reading on secondary harm and perception/situational variables
-
Daly's 2021 repetition of Rind (1998), finds that self-perception is far more important that abuse status
-
General reading on intrinsic harm
-
The Rind team comment on the self-fulfilling prophecy of iatrogenic harm
-
The Rind team comment further on iatrogenic harm
-
CSA harm was known to be counfounded even before Rind
-
No "typical" CSA reaction or "syndrome"
.jpg)
.jpg)
