Debate Guide: Pedophilia is unnatural: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ''"Pedophilia is sick and unnatural and WRONG!"'' OK. You seem to believe that something is wrong because it is unnatural (which is not the case anyway). This is not necessarily so. ''"A...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''"Pedophilia is sick and unnatural and WRONG!"'' | ''"Pedophilia is sick and unnatural and WRONG!"'' | ||
OK. You seem to believe that something is wrong because it is unnatural (which is not the case anyway). This is not necessarily so. | OK. You seem to believe that something is wrong because it is unnatural (which is not the case anyway). This is not necessarily so. Some of the most useful ideas would appear to have no grounding in nature. Think about it. Would you be where you are without them? | ||
''"Assuming that the average child begins puberty at fourteen years, the vast majority of preteens would be prepubescent. Sexual attraction also requires either masculine or feminine secondary sexual characteristics and therefore, a preteen child would be as sexually attractive as a broom or pot plant."'' (actual argument from Condraz23 on IIDB) | ''"Assuming that the average child begins puberty at fourteen years, the vast majority of preteens would be prepubescent. Sexual attraction also requires either masculine or feminine secondary sexual characteristics and therefore, a preteen child would be as sexually attractive as a broom or pot plant."'' (actual argument from Condraz23 on IIDB) | ||
Revision as of 23:58, 11 May 2008
"Pedophilia is sick and unnatural and WRONG!"
OK. You seem to believe that something is wrong because it is unnatural (which is not the case anyway). This is not necessarily so. Some of the most useful ideas would appear to have no grounding in nature. Think about it. Would you be where you are without them?
"Assuming that the average child begins puberty at fourteen years, the vast majority of preteens would be prepubescent. Sexual attraction also requires either masculine or feminine secondary sexual characteristics and therefore, a preteen child would be as sexually attractive as a broom or pot plant." (actual argument from Condraz23 on IIDB)