Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors

Sex, children and minors are not incompatible...

• Evolutionary logic - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
• Cyclical paternalism - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
• Prior experience - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
• The fallacy of "sexual maturity" - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed.
• Against: Cognitive ability - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
• Against: Childhood innocence - Childhood innocence is not a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

• Sexual neglect - Neglect of a child's sexuality may be abusive.
• Reverse sexualisation - Popular acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
• Liberty-empowerment - Empowering young people will benefit them.
• Turn of events - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.
• Against: Online dangers - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.

Child advocacy is often illogical...

• Against: The kids do not want it - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
• Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.

From the encyclopedia...

• Youth are sexually persecuted through the legal system
• So-called child pornography and it's effects on minors.