Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
'''Child advocacy is often illogical...'''
'''Child advocacy is often illogical...'''


*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Legal minors must supposedly "embrace" or "consent to" law reforms.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Corresponding age attraction|Corresponding age attraction]] - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.
*''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Corresponding age attraction|Corresponding age attraction]] - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.

Revision as of 06:55, 14 October 2021

People under the age of majority can be sexual...

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

Child advocacy is often illogical...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Legal minors must supposedly "embrace" or "consent to" law reforms.
  • Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
  • Against: Corresponding age attraction - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.

From the encyclopedia...