Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (interval update) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Prior experience|Prior experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience. | *[[Debate Guide: Prior experience|Prior experience]] - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: The fallacy of "sexual maturity"|The fallacy of "sexual maturity"]] - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed. | *[[Debate Guide: The fallacy of "sexual maturity"|The fallacy of "sexual maturity"]] - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed. | ||
* | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Cognitive ability|Cognitive ability]] - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached. | ||
* | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Childhood innocence|Childhood innocence]] - Childhood innocence is ''not'' a state of asexuality that can be "stolen". | ||
'''Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...''' | '''Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...''' | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Liberty-empowerment|Liberty-empowerment]] - Empowering young people will benefit them. | *[[Debate Guide: Liberty-empowerment|Liberty-empowerment]] - Empowering young people will benefit them. | ||
*[[Debate Guide: Turn of events|Turn of events]] - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth. | *[[Debate Guide: Turn of events|Turn of events]] - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth. | ||
* | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Online dangers|Online dangers]] - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors. | ||
'''Child advocacy is often illogical...''' | '''Child advocacy is often illogical...''' | ||
* | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: The kids do not want it|The kids do not want it]] - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against. | ||
* | *''Against:'' [[Debate Guide: Teen brain|Teen brain]] - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda. | ||
'''From the encyclopedia...''' | '''From the encyclopedia...''' | ||
Revision as of 19:17, 18 December 2008
Sex, children and minors are not incompatible...
- Evolutionary logic - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
- Cyclical paternalism - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
- Prior experience - There is only one true way of gaining sexual experience.
- The fallacy of "sexual maturity" - The concept, as used in child advocacy is fatally flawed.
- Against: Cognitive ability - Some argue that sexual intimacy requires a level that minors have not yet reached.
- Against: Childhood innocence - Childhood innocence is not a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".
Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...
- Sexual neglect - Neglect of a child's sexuality may be abusive.
- Reverse sexualisation - Popular acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
- Liberty-empowerment - Empowering young people will benefit them.
- Turn of events - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.
- Against: Online dangers - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.
Child advocacy is often illogical...
- Against: The kids do not want it - Disputes the claim that minors' general apathy in calling for reform counts as an argument against.
- Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
From the encyclopedia...
- Youth are sexually persecuted through the legal system
- So-called child pornography and it's effects on minors.