Template:Debate Guide:Arguments about children and minors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Admins (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
The Admins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
'''From the encyclopedia...''' | '''From the encyclopedia...''' | ||
*[[ | *[[Ageism|Youth are sexually persecuted through the legal system]] | ||
*So-called [[Research: Child Pornography|child pornography]] and it's effects on minors. | *So-called [[Research: Child Pornography|child pornography]] and it's effects on minors. | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 4 January 2022
People under the age of majority can be sexual...
- Against: Cognitive ability = consent - Some argue that true informed consent to voluntary sexual activity is a "special case".
- Against: Childhood innocence - Childhood innocence is not a state of asexuality that can be "stolen".
- Evolutionary logic - Why CSA makes no sense in evolutionary terms.
- Cyclical paternalism - Protecting children brings about the need to protect them more.
Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...
- Against: Online dangers - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.
- Reverse sexualisation - Popular acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
- Liberty-empowerment - Empowering young people will benefit them.
- Turn of events - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.
Child advocacy is often illogical...
- Against: The kids do not want it - Legal minors must supposedly "embrace" or "consent to" law reforms.
- Against: Teen brain - Teen brain speculating (inferiority) is value laden, pseudoscientific propaganda.
- Against: Corresponding age attraction - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.
From the encyclopedia...
- Youth are sexually persecuted through the legal system
- So-called child pornography and it's effects on minors.