Latest: Dissident Dutch author A.H.J. Dautzenberg alleges serious malpractice on the part of Tim Ballard in his new exclusive: Gruesome Consequences of a Hysterical Witch Hunt, in which mistreatment of his friend Marthijn Uittenbogaard and his partner is also exposed. Both remain incarcerated in Ecuador on trumped-up charges. Legal process has recommenced (see updates).

Talk:Abel screening

From NewgonWiki
Revision as of 21:13, 13 June 2009 by The Admins (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Can someone make this flow better? Rez (The Administrators - anonym) 00:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

"Further, there was no evidence indicating that the study itself had been rigorously examined (for instance, through the process of peer review) and nothing to show "the significance of a subject viewing slides of children for one-third as long as [the study subject] viewed slides of adults" -- the "fail" score that Abel derived from the study."[1]

Does this mean that viewing children and adults for equal lengths won't work? Jillium 04:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

From what I have heard about the test, it looks as if this is a typing error. Significance would mean +1/3 on child stimuli. The Admins 21:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)