Lolicon-MAP Equivalence Debate
The Lolicon-MAP Equivalence Debate is a frequent low-intelligence debate that takes place within the Lolicon and MAP social media communities.
Usually, these arguments will begin when a Lolicon consumer (with large amounts of Lolicon on their timeline) is baited by a low-intelligence bovine leftist or conservative, who insists, with marked derogation, that the Lolicon intends to harm or abuse a child. As the Lolicon is invested in his own kind of acceptability politics, he responds defensively, insisting that he is "valid", not a "MAP" or "pedophile", and would never go anywhere near real child erotica. Sometimes, but not very often, the person doing the baiting is a MAP responding to overly virtuous behaviour by the Lolicon.
This debate is often described as "tiresome" due to the low intelligence of the participants and their general inflexibility.
The obvious resolution to this debate (rarely arrived at, if ever) is for the Lolicon to admit that he is minor-attracted in the most fundamental sense, but is successfully controlling those tendencies through the consumption of drawn erotica. The "anti" in this debate, should accept on his part, that there is no evidence of offending on the part of the Lolicon, and no equivalence between viewing any image and pursuing a minor. The "anti" should also consider his own insecurities and the possibility these may have arisen due to latent pedophilia.