Debate Guide: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(welcome back debate guide, will you refresh your tables?)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTITLE__
__NOTITLE__
<div style="font-size:10%; color:#fff;">
G O O G L E B O M B, BoyLover, GirlLover, Childlove, Pedophilia, Child, Rape, Sick, Evil, Jack McClellan, Pedo, Perverted Justice, Satanic Ritual Abuse, Human Trafficking, The truth about Paedophilia, Michael Jackson Pedophilia, Sarah Payne Murder, Soham Murders, NSPCC child abuse, Bruce Rind, PNVD pedophilia, pedophile party, pedopartij, NAMBLA, Daniel Lièvre, Tom O'Carroll, Paedophilia in Britain, USA, American pedophilia, Paedophile Information Exchange, UNCRC Convention, Children's rights, Child protection, Child sexual abuse, every child matters, debate, win arguments, discussion, pedobear, forum, bbs, bulletin board, loli, castorama, ricrisci, notamonster G O O G L E B O M B</div>
__NOTOC__  
__NOTOC__  
{|class="boilerplate" id="pd" style="width:80%; -moz-border-radius: 1em; margin: 0 auto; border:3px solid black; padding:5px; background-color:#57E964;" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4"
{|class="boilerplate" id="pd" style="width:80%; -moz-border-radius: 1em; margin: 0 auto; border:3px solid black; padding:5px; background-color:#57E964;" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4"

Revision as of 00:19, 22 September 2021


Debate Guide is a growing list of arguments and counter arguments for the sexual emancipation of minors and minor attracted adults. It also functions as centre for advice, links and external debate resources pertaining to these issues and the age of consent. Why not consider reading our introduction or getting involved in the wider wiki project?


Advice

The task at hand...

Responding to others...

Arguments about pedophilia/other attractions

Too many people hold conflicting beliefs about pedophilia and other sexuality...

Popular anti-pedophile sentiments and common human flaws go hand in hand...

Pedophilia and human sexuality are mischaracterized and misunderstood...

Arguments about children and minors

People under the age of majority can be sexual...

Sexually repressing children and minors does not benefit them...

  • Against: Online dangers - The internet is generally not a dangerous place for minors.
  • Reverse sexualization - Popular acknowledgement of sexuality in nude photography is revealing.
  • Liberty-empowerment - Empowering young people will benefit them.
  • Turn of events - How the reporting and prosecution of sex can change the perspective of a youth.

Child advocacy is often illogical...

  • Against: The kids do not want it - Legal minors must supposedly "embrace" or "consent to" law reforms.
  • Against: Teen brain - Ideas of a distinct, or inferior "teen brain" are value-laden, outdated western pseudoscience.
  • Against: Corresponding age attraction - Questions the assumption of a unique "childhood" sexual orientation.

From the encyclopedia...

Arguments about adult-minor relationships

People fail to appreciate the flaws of Age of Consent laws...

Myths and bad meta-ethics plague discussions of expressed adult-minor sexuality...

Levels of harm are exaggerated and the sources are completely misunderstood...

Other societies and species are points of interest...

Many people also speak from direct experience...

Other arguments

Other arguments don't relate fundamentally to attractions, minors or relationships...

Debate Guide is a work in progress, and some material is undeveloped...

From the encyclopedia...


Thank you for reading

You may also find some other resources of ours useful in debate situations. Check out research for a collection of scientific research and other demonstrative references on matters relevant to minor sexuality. People and organisations is an easy to use database of all the individuals and organisations of interest to those who follow our ethos. Our database of real-life stories lists personal testimonies intended to be used as evidence of positive relationships. Links (Fora) documents some fora that may be receptive to your arguments and lists examples of this.

Debate Guide was written by a range of authors during the years 2006-09. If you are not pleased with the quality of Debate Guide, consider getting involved. From the simplest of corrections to the most complex of new arguments, we want to hear from you. Just drop by the feedback forum, or e-mail an administrator. You could even be given membership to edit this wiki!