Actuarial testing: Difference between revisions

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: '''Actuarial (risk related) testing''' has been used to determine the likelihood of a sexual offender re-offending at the sentencing stage of court proc...)
 
mNo edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


The role that actuarial tests have to play in hyping, undermining or introducing proportional response to the sentencing of a subject is disputable, and dependent upon the test itself. There has been some dispute as to whether actuarial tests can be used to pinpoint or dismiss mental abnormalities in court cases.<ref>http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_29290.htm</ref>
The role that actuarial tests have to play in hyping, undermining or introducing proportional response to the sentencing of a subject is disputable, and dependent upon the test itself. There has been some dispute as to whether actuarial tests can be used to pinpoint or dismiss mental abnormalities in court cases.<ref>http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2009/2009_29290.htm</ref>
==References==
{{reflist}}


==External link==
==External link==

Latest revision as of 13:15, 12 July 2009

Actuarial (risk related) testing has been used to determine the likelihood of a sexual offender re-offending at the sentencing stage of court proceedings in many legal systems.

A typical actuarial test will establish its norms from a large sample of offenders, making note of their characteristics and re-offending rates. The subject under review will be tested and compared to these norms, and the risk of re-offending will then be determined and taken into account at sentencing.

The role that actuarial tests have to play in hyping, undermining or introducing proportional response to the sentencing of a subject is disputable, and dependent upon the test itself. There has been some dispute as to whether actuarial tests can be used to pinpoint or dismiss mental abnormalities in court cases.[1]

References

External link