Rainbow Revisionism

From NewgonWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The modern-day pride movement seeks to appease its new corporate allies by sanitizing its own people's history

Rainbow Revisionism is a phenomenon whereby historical queer figures and events are either memory-holed or sanitized in such a way as to remove expressions of queerness deemed inconvenient to the "political objectives" of the modern LGBTQ+ Movement. Usually, the target of this revisionism is historical pederasty. While revisionism is a discrete form of information warfare, the Rainbow Reactionaries who promulgate it may at the same time enjoy the lower-brow practise of Validity Policing. The revisionist phenomenon is thought to have increased in its velocity since the exclusion of pederasts from the gay movement in the 80s, which was formalized in the 90s.

Well-known subjects of Rainbow Revisionism

The history of homosexuality itself is a subject of Rainbow Revisionism, as documented by Bruce Rind, in his analysis of various texts in 1998.[1] As our article points out, the events of Stonewall are routinely whitewashed, as are the following movement's manifestations against the Age of Consent - including those supported by celebrated founding members and the ILGA umbrella. Publications such as Spartacus International Gay Guide are good examples of how the gay movement and press whitewashed their history throughout the 1980s and 90s. The hostile reaction of the gay press to a pederastic novel, Alexander's Choice is another telling example.

Bruce Rind has attacked this subject in further treatments of Pederasty[2]

One example of this rewriting of history is the gay New York Times journalist, Anthony Tommasini describing Franz Schubert's reported partners as "adolescent men", a category otherwise unheard of in any form of commentary or analysis.[3] In another, a famous book by John Addington Symonds (in effect, a treatment of Pederasty), was recalled as "promoting the morality of same-sex relations".[4] The piece contains the first known mention of the term boylove.

The following prominent pederasts are either worshipped as "gay icons", or assumed to be homosexual in the modern, sanitized sense:

The following prominent pederasts have been permitted a public legacy, while certain aspects of their homosexuality have been ignored:

Historical forgiveness coefficient

When assessing the case of many a historical pederast - it often becomes apparent that the earlier they lived, the more likely they are to be assumed a "straight gay" for pederasty that would be deemed unfathomable by modern-day standards and incompatible with gay identity. What this appears to reveal is that modern "queerness" and "gay identity" is more of a political project than its proponents are willing to admit.

"Coming to terms" with inconvenient 20th century pederasty

Birgit Bosold was appointed as curator at Berlin's Schwules Museum in 2006. Since then, the museum has slowly pushed towards a strategy of "atonement" for the association of pederasts with the German gay movement, rather than attempting to deny all connections (in the case of Germany, initial reaction to the American rejection of pederast groups was particularly strong)

On some occasions, historical examples of LGBT-MAP unity have been deliberately acknowledged by gay thought leaders, and then arbitrarily disavowed with overt displays of pedophobia. In 2023, a Berlin gay museum presented an exhibition doing just that, entitled "Sexualized violence against children and young people in the context of emancipation". According to the museum, both institutions involved had "committed themselves to consistently coming to terms with the disturbing fact that the communities whose legacy they are preserving offer space for sexualised violence against children and young people and their trivialization or ideological justification". A press release even suggested that the movement of the time was "susceptible" to the "rhetoric of perpetrators" - a charge that is particularly absurd given just how strongly the German gay community fought back against the sidelining of pederasts in the late 80s and 90s. In the founding statutes of the Museum itself, "boy lovers" were still listed as a "group to be appreciated" up until 2010, according to its curator.[6]

"Woke" liberal revisionism

Some heterodox and right-leaning LGBT people and their supporters[7] complain that since the ascendancy of hyper-orthodox social-justice informed identity politics in the 10s, aspects of their history are being re-written by progressive activists. This is alleged (again) in the example of Stonewall and the New York Gay Scene. Already cleansed of their pederastic significance, the riots are now erroneously said to have been "started by a black trans woman", leading honest supervisors to advise their students to ignore sources published after 2010.[8]

The term has also been used by conservatives in reference to attempts by gay activists to influence traditional cultures usually seen by liberals as in need of protection.[9]

See also