From NewgonWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Adolescence (from Latin adolescere 'to mature') generally refers to a period of life following late puberty, but preceding legal adulthood. As with legal adulthood/age of majority, adolescence is by and large a culturally emergent concept of the post-industrial 20th century, and doesn’t have any consistent, prevailing basis in nature or between cultures. Whilst it is unavoidable that humans continue to learn socially, develop emotionally and cultivate a variety of other skills throughout their lives, it is most likely that adolescence emerged merely as a control mechanism, serving to extend childhood upwards well beyond the end of puberty. For the corporate and political hierarchy, this is convenient for the following reasons:

  • In post industrial democracies, keeping smarter children in formal education til their late 20s forces them into debt, and enlists them as high-level servants of the establishment – well into their 40s.
  • During this period, young people can be politically indoctrinated to better conform to the state’s moral and economic schemes. A prolonged period of indoctrination is required after foundational education – systematizing young people and harnessing a fear of nonconformity and its consequences.
  • Mid-witted (40-60+% of) children become over-confident, “educated idiots” - who are useful acolytes of the state since they are immersed in a world of theory, with no experience of real world capital systems. The over-confident, “politically engaged” mid-wit at 24/25 is as important as the eternal child at 17/18, as one is the product of the other. In reality, if adolescence is held to be a distinctive “phase of development”, it likely goes on well into the 40s and beyond, as we develop through our ideas and experiences. The confident young adult who disregards this, and believes he has “passed” adolescence with an undergraduate degree, is none the wiser and therefore a useful tool for the establishment.
  • A “problematic” period of life, in which adult authority is maintained beyond natural necessity, prevents young entrepreneurship. This includes the possibility of legal sex work among youth, thus stemming the explosive potential for “premature” generational wealth transfer. Young adults who are self-sufficient in their 20s/30s, and not dependent on governments are a threat in post-industrial democracies with high life expectancies. Good, indebted state subjects on the other hand, are less likely to be skeptical or antagonistic towards state objectives.
  • Adolescence is in and of itself an industry. Young people are on the one hand constrained and stigmatized by systemic and social pressures, allowing for therapeutic and pharmaceutical interventions to be presented as the inevitable “solutions” of those supposed pathologies of youth. The monetary costs of adolescent problems and adolescent lifestyle trends are offloaded onto the parents, who are in turn indebted and become state welfare subjects who are desperate to be bought at the ballot box by further political promises.

Mechanisms of fabrication

We see a few recurrent themes in mainstream literature, regarding the scientific construction of adolescence as a uniquely problematical period of life. Behavioural correlation studies are one method, whereby certain socially taboo “problem behaviors” such as early sex and alcohol use are unsurprisingly observed at the same time in a number of youth, leading to flawed conclusions.

Confounding variables

Using the above as an example, the obvious conclusion is that since the prevailing western social context frames both loss of virginity (particularly among girls) and alcohol use as delinquent behaviors, they will often occur in the same unsupervised youth who are contravening social boundaries. It is also likely that youth who suffer from abusive or drug-dependent parents will be unsupervised for long periods of time, and engage in a wide variety of behaviors that are defined as socially delinquent. The true causes of negative outcomes in youth will correlate with numerous socially taboo behaviors (symptoms) – that much is obvious. What this does not prove, is the intrinsic harmfulness of some of these by-product phenomena (sex, drinking, drugs), which are often cathartic with respect to the negative social context. It is also true that the negative social/caregiver context may have a poisoning effect on the catharsis behaviors (excess, overdosing, lack of contraception, use of drugs during periods of mental vulnerability, and the ensuing dependency relationship).

Many cultures present, and throughout the not too distant past have encouraged an early age of “first sex” and drinking, supervising these behaviors and adopting them as institutional norms. Within a supportive culture, these behaviors come to be seen as healthy and adaptive. With no apparent reason for this to be documented, studied or pathologized in any way, we rarely hear about these alternative norms in the history books, only gaining an insight on those rare occasions western anthropologists, missionaries and ethnographers come into contact with them.

Teen Brain – wrong conclusions from brain scans

Physiology is often abused, to create the illusion of an objectively different, or deficient "teen brain". As our article on cognitive ability explains, these claims are completely unfounded.

Risk over reward

Psychologists often generalize from behavioral studies, that teens are inherently impulsive, and willing to take greater risks than their adult peers. Whilst this is incorrect and culturally biased as eluded to in the above article - it also involves a fallacious value judgment. Outcomes of risk-taking behaviors (including learning benefits) are rarely measured or documented, and thus the researchers exhibit a negative utilitarian bias.

Scientific literature that pathologizes adolescence

Many examples are present in the Wikipedia entries on the topic, which read like a who's-who of teen-brain and troubled teen grift-scholars. This is most probably because said authors spend hours editing the articles, posing as disinterested experts - a method special interest editors are known to employ rigorously.

See also

External links